United States v. Barrientez
United States v. Barrientez
Opinion
Case: 23-10729 Document: 00517055241 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-10729 February 5, 2024 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Nathan Barrientez, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-98-2 ______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Nathan Barrientez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Barrientez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10729 Document: 00517055241 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2024
No. 23-10729
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.