United States v. Rojas
United States v. Rojas
Opinion
Case: 23-10762 Document: 00517056842 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10762 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 6, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Eliosbeth Rojas, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-85-1 ______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eliosbeth Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10762 Document: 00517056842 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2024
No. 23-10762
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.