United States v. Sears
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Sears
Opinion
Case: 23-40135 Document: 00517059885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2024
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
____________
FILED
February 8, 2024
No. 23-40135
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Cortese Sears,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:20-CR-203-1
______________________________
Before Elrod, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Cortese Sears has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Sears has not filed a response.
Counsel’s brief is inadequate in the following respect. Counsel has not
addressed whether there is a nonfrivolous issue for appeal on plain error
review as to whether Sears’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40135 Document: 00517059885 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2024
No. 23-40135
the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), and whether such a challenge is barred by the
appeal waiver in Sears’s plea agreement.
Counsel is ORDERED to file within 30 days a supplemental Anders
brief addressing the above issue or, in the alternative, a brief on the merits
addressing any nonfrivolous issues that counsel deems appropriate.
The motion to withdraw is CARRIED with the case. This motion
will be considered moot if a merits brief is filed.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished