Carew v. Senseonics Holdings
Carew v. Senseonics Holdings
Opinion
Case: 23-50307 Document: 66-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/28/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ February 28, 2024 No. 23-50307 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, ex rel, State of Texas, ex rel, Christopher A. Carew, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Senseonics Holdings, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation; Senseonics, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:20-CV-657 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Smith, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * Appellant Christopher Carew appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss, which found that Carew failed to state a claim under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., as he did not satisfy the pleading standards under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9 and
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-50307 Document: 66-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/28/2024
No. 23-50307
this Circuit’s precedent under United States ex rel. Grubbs v. Kanneganti. 1 Finding no error, we agree and AFFIRM for essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion.
_____________________ 565 F.3d 180, 190 (5th Cir. 2009).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.