United States v. Hernandez
United States v. Hernandez
Opinion
Case: 23-50521 Document: 47-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50521 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 1, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Jesus Meza Hernandez, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:23-CR-35-1 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * Jesus Meza Hernandez appeals his sentence of 37 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fentanyl. His sole challenge now is to a condition of his supervised release. Under that condition, if his probation officer determines Hernandez poses a risk to _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 23-50521 Document: 47-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2024
No. 23-50521
another person, the officer may require Hernandez to notify that person of the risk. Hernandez argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in imposing this condition because it constitutes an impermissible delegation of judicial authority.
Hernandez properly concedes that this issue is foreclosed by United States v. Mejia-Banegas, 32 F.4th 450, 452 (5th Cir. 2022). He raises the issue to preserve it for further review. The Government has moved without opposition for summary affirmance, or in the alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits.
Because summary affirmance is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.