United States v. Rangel
United States v. Rangel
Opinion
Case: 23-40542 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-40542 June 4, 2024 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Steven David Rangel, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-266-1 ______________________________ Before Clement, Elrod, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Steven David Rangel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rangel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40542 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/04/2024
No. 23-40542
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.