Little v. Llano County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Little v. Llano County, 106 F.4th 426 (5th Cir. 2024)
Little v. Llano County
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
___________ FILED
July 3, 2024
No. 23-50224 Lyle W. Cayce
___________ Clerk
Leila Green Little; Jeanne Puryear; Kathy Kennedy;
Rebecca Jones; Richard Day; Cynthia Waring; Diane
Moster,
Plaintiffs—Appellees,
versus
Llano County; Ron Cunningham, in his official capacity as Llano
County Judge; Jerry Don Moss, in his official capacity as Llano County
Commissioner; Peter Jones, in his official capacity as Llano County
Commissioner; Mike Sandoval, in his official capacity as Llano County
Commissioner; Linda Raschke, in her official capacity as Llano County
Commissioner; Amber Milum, in her official capacity as Llano County
Library System Director; Bonnie Wallace, in her official capacity as
Llano County Library Board Member; Rochelle Wells, in her official
capacity as Llano County Library Board Member; Rhoda Schneider, in
her official capacity as Llano County Library Board Member; Gay Baskin,
in her official capacity as Llano County Library Board Member,
Defendants—Appellants.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:22-CV-424
______________________________
No. 23-50224
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion June 6, 2024 , 5 Cir., 2024, 103 F.4th 1140)
Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, and
Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated June 6, 2024, is
VACATED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Published