United States v. Morgan
United States v. Morgan
Opinion
Case: 24-20054 Document: 59-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED February 12, 2025 No. 24-20054 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Tramarcus Morgan, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-439-1 ______________________________ Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Tramarcus Morgan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morgan has filed a response in which he moves for leave to proceed pro se on appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-20054 Document: 59-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2025
No. 24-20054
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Morgan’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.