United States v. Griffith
Opinion
Case: 24-10820 Document: 37-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-10820
Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 13, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
William Lloyd Griffith,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-250-7 ______________________________
Before Graves, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The Federal Public Defender representing William Lloyd Griffith in his appeal of his revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence of eight months’ imprisonment seeks leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Griffith has not filed a response.
Case: 24-10820 Document: 37-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2025
No. 24-10820
During the pendency of this appeal, Griffith completed the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.