United States v. Coopmans

Case: 24-40379 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

No. 24-40379

Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 18, 2025

Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee, versus

Eddy Johan Coopmans,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-207-2

______________________________

Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: *

The attorney appointed to represent Eddy Coopmans has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Coopmans has not filed a response.

The timeliness of Coopmans’s notice of appeal does not present a jur- Case: 24-40379 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2025

No. 24-40379 isdictional impediment, so we pretermit the issue. See United States v. Mar- tinez, 496 F.3d 387, 388–89 (5th Cir. 2007).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non- frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.