United States v. Watts
United States v. Watts
Opinion
Case: 23-30842 Document: 76-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-30842 February 20, 2025 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Alvin Watts, III, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:16-CR-104-1 ______________________________ Before Southwick, Willett, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* Alvin Watts, III, federal prisoner #08514-095, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) from the denial of his motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. His motion raised claims based on, inter alia, a sentencing order that he argued constituted newly discovered evidence. By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Watts is challenging the _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-30842 Document: 76-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2025
No. 23-30842
district court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
Watts shows no error in the district court’s conclusion that the disputed sentencing order did not constitute newly discovered evidence for Rule 33 purposes. Accordingly, Watts has failed to raise a nonfrivolous issue regarding whether the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule motion for a new trial. See United States v. Wall, 389 F.3d 457, 467 (5th Cir. 2004); Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). His motions to proceed IFP on appeal and for appointed counsel are DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.