Bogdanov v. Ainley
Opinion
Case: 24-30625 Document: 35-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-30625
Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 10, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce Vladimir Bogdanov, Clerk Petitioner—Appellant, versus
Robert M. Ainley; Patrick Arbuco; Denae T. Halsey,
Respondents—Appellees. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:24-CV-673 ______________________________
Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Vladimir Bogdanov, a native and citizen of Russia, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his detention during the pendency of his asylum proceedings. He also asserted claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Case: 24-30625 Document: 35-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2025
No. 24-30625
“Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter, since it implicates the Article III requirement that there be a live case or controversy.” Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). While Bogdanov argues that his detention during his asylum proceedings was arbitrary, capricious, abusive of discretion, and not otherwise in accordance with law, any such challenge is moot as he has been ordered removed and his detention is now governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1231. See Andrade v. Gonzales, 459 F.3d 538, 542-43 (5th Cir. 2006). Thus, we lack jurisdiction. DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.