United States v. Rollerson

Case: 23-11058 Document: 71-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-11058

Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 11, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus

Braddic Deshaun Rollerson,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:23-CR-100-1 ______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: *

Braddic Deshaun Rollerson contends that the statute under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). The Government has filed an unopposed motion for Case: 23-11058 Document: 71-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2025

No. 23-11058 summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time in which to file a brief.

The Government is correct that Rollerson’s challenge is foreclosed. See United States v. Diaz, 116 F.4th 458, 471-72 (5th Cir. 2024). Therefore, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.