United States v. Robinson
Opinion
Case: 24-10476 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 12, 2025 No. 24-10476
Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar
Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
Sir Louis Robinson,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:23-CR-4-1 ______________________________
Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Sir Louis Robinson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Robinson has filed a response moving for the appointment of new appellate counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant Case: 24-10476 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2025
No. 24-10476 portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Robinson’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Robinson’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.