United States v. Valencia-Casquete
United States v. Valencia-Casquete
Opinion
Case: 24-30371 Document: 82-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-30371 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 20, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Eduardo Valencia-Casquete, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:21-CR-168-1 ______________________________ Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Haynes, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Eduardo Valencia-Casquete has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Valencia-Casquete has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Valencia- _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-30371 Document: 82-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2025
No. 24-30371
Casquete’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Valencia-Casquete’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.