U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2025

United States v. Bruzh Smith

United States v. Bruzh Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 24, 2025

United States v. Bruzh Smith

Opinion

Case: 23-40678 Document: 70-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-40678 March 24, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Daijzhainel Ambrozhai Bruzh Smith, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-58-8 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Daijzhainel Ambrozhai Bruzh Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Smith has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-40678 Document: 70-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2025

No. 23-40678

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.