United States v. Bartlett
United States v. Bartlett
Opinion
Case: 24-40343 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-40343 April 16, 2025 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Donald Bartlett, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-71-18 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Donald Bartlett has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Bartlett has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Bartlett’s claim of ineffective assistance of _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-40343 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2025
No. 24-40343
counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Bartlett’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Bartlett’s motion to place the case under seal is GRANTED in part to seal his response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. His motion is DENIED in all other respects.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.