Case: 24-20547 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ No. 24-20547 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit Summary Calendar ____________ FILED April 16, 2025 Timothy Anthony Redic, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff—Appellant, versus J. Back; John Doe; John Doe, II; John Doe, III; John Doe, IV, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CV-3782 ______________________________ Before Ho, Wilson, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Timothy Anthony Redic, Texas prisoner # 836869, moves for leave to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Redic asserts that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury due to false disciplinary cases that have been filed against him and his placement in a cell _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-20547 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2025

No. 24-20547

with an inmate who has attacked him. However, he fails to make the required showing of an imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Baños v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, Redic has not shown that he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Redic’s IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We remind Redic that, because he has three strikes, he is barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He is also WARNED that any pending or future frivolous or repetitive filings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction will subject him to additional sanctions. See Coghlan v. Starkey, 852 F.2d 806, 817 n.21 (5th Cir. 1998).