Thomas v. Richard
Thomas v. Richard
Opinion
Case: 24-30678 Document: 26-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/27/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 24-30678 FILED May 27, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Balazkie R. Thomas, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Hillary Richard; Alicia Phillips-Kelly; Renata Richard, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:23-CV-1072 ______________________________ Before Dennis, Ho, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * Plaintiff-Appellant Balazkie Thomas brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by Defendants-Appellees Hillary Richard, Alicia Phillips-Kelly, and Renata Richard. The district court dismissed Thomas’s claims under Federal
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-30678 Document: 26-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/27/2025
No. 24-30678
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), finding that his § 1983 claims failed because Defendants are not state actors.
Section 1983 authorizes a claim for relief only against persons who acted under color of state law. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. “For a private citizen . . . to be held liable under section 1983, the plaintiff must allege that the citizen conspired with or acted in concert with state actors.” Priester v. Lowndes Cnty., 354 F.3d 414, 420 (5th Cir. 2004). Plaintiff does not allege that any Defendant is a state actor, or that they acted in concert with state actors, foreclosing his § 1983 claims. As such, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.