United States v. Santana Joseph
Opinion
Case: 24-50865 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 2, 2025 No. 24-50865 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
Julio Amado Santana Joseph,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-2956-1 ______________________________
Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Julio Amado Santana Joseph has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santana Joseph has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.
Case: 24-50865 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2025
No. 24-50865
It is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of the appeal. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, without prejudice to a future 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that Santana Joseph may file, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.