United States v. Hicks
United States v. Hicks
Opinion
Case: 24-50936 Document: 41-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 11, 2025 No. 24-50936 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Brandon Hicks, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:24-CR-51-1 ______________________________ Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brandon Joseph Hicks has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hicks has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-50936 Document: 41-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2025
No. 24-50936
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.