United States v. Aguilar-Torres
United States v. Aguilar-Torres
Opinion
Case: 23-50866 Document: 151-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 23-50866 FILED June 13, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Elauterio Aguilar-Torres, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:23-CR-272-1 ______________________________ Before Jones, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* Elauterio Aguilar-Torres appeals his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He contends that § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applicable statutory maximum based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-50866 Document: 151-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2025
No. 23-50866
However, he concedes that this argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and merely raises this issue to preserve it for further review. The Government has moved without opposition for summary affirmance, or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief.
Because summary affirmance is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.