United States v. Hicks

Case: 23-50030 Document: 82-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

No. 23-50030

Summary Calendar FILED ____________ July 23, 2025

Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellant, versus

Deonte Kyrique Hicks,

Defendant—Appellee.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:21-CR-60-1 ______________________________

Before Graves, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: *

The Government appeals the dismissal of Deonte Kyrique Hicks’s indictment. The district court held that the statute underlying the indictment, 18 U.S.C. § 922(n), is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, Case: 23-50030 Document: 82-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2025

No. 23-50030

597 U.S. 1 (2022). The Government now seeks summary disposition or, in the alternative, an extension of time to file its brief.

Because Hicks opposes summary disposition and has not conceded that controlling precedent forecloses his position, we decline to grant the Government’s motion. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969); Khan v. Garland, No. 21-60372, 2021 WL 5227077, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 9, 2021). Even so, the Government is correct that the district court’s dismissal runs afoul of United States v. Quiroz, 125 F.4th 713, 717-25 (5th Cir. 2025), petition for cert. filed (U.S. May 29, 2025) (No. 24- 7342). In light of Quiroz, no further briefing is necessary. See United States v. Bailey, 924 F.3d 1289, 1290 (5th Cir. 2019).

We therefore DENY the Government’s motion for summary disposition, REVERSE the district court’s dismissal order, and REMAND for further proceedings. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED AS MOOT.