United States v. Salto
United States v. Salto
Opinion
Case: 25-10236 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 25-10236 August 5, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Indorfo Soriano Salto, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CR-88-2 ______________________________ Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Indorfo Soriano Salto has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salto has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Salto’s _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-10236 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/05/2025
No. 25-10236
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.