U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2025

United States v. Trevino

United States v. Trevino
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 15, 2025

United States v. Trevino

Opinion

Case: 24-50150 Document: 88-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-50150 August 15, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Samuel Suess Trevino, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:21-CR-115-1 ______________________________ Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Samuel Suess Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). We granted Trevino’s motions to access sealed portions of the record and for extensions of time to file a response, but he has _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-50150 Document: 88-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2025

No. 24-50150

not filed a response. However, we have considered arguments related to the underlying proceedings that are included in Trevino’s motions. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Trevino’s arguments. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.