United States v. Centeno
Opinion
Case: 25-10469 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 25-10469 August 29, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
Kevin Centeno,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:24-CR-99-1 ______________________________
Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Centeno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Centeno has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s Case: 25-10469 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2025
No. 25-10469 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.