U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2025

Lara v. Penhall Company

Lara v. Penhall Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 10, 2025

Lara v. Penhall Company

Opinion

Case: 25-10403 Document: 27-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-10403 FILED September 10, 2025 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Adam Lara, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Penhall Company, Defendant—Appellee. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:25-CV-293 ______________________________ Before Wiener, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Plaintiff-Appellant Adam Lara appeals pro se the district court’s dis- missal of his employment-discrimination lawsuit. Lara has failed to brief any of his claims on appeal adequately and thus has forfeited them. See Rollins v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 8 F.4th 393, 397 (5th Cir. 2021) (“A party forfeits an argument . . . by failing to adequately brief the argument on appeal.”). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.