Linicomn v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
Linicomn v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
Opinion
Case: 24-20505 Document: 80-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-20505 consolidated with FILED No. 24-20545 September 26, 2025 _____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Roosevelt L. Linicomn, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Harris County Sheriff’s Office; Harris County District Attorney’s Office; Harris County Commissioners Court; Steven Belt; Michelle Anderson; E. Crain; B. Evans; E. Wilrich; A.C. Husley; Patrick J.
Ruzzo; United States Attorney Office, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CV-389 ______________________________ Before Barksdale, Oldham, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-20505 Document: 80-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/26/2025
No. 24-20505 c/w No. 24-20545 Roosevelt L. Linicomn, Jr., proceeding pro se in district court and on appeal, contests the dismissal of his action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His notice of appeal is untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (30-day deadline unless United States agency, officer, or government is party).
Along that line, he contends his appeal was subject to a 60-day deadline, asserting his action named the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) as a party. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). The USAO was never served, however, and made only a limited appearance to assert the court lacked jurisdiction over it. See Jones v. Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C., 82 F.3d 1334, 1340 (5th Cir. 1996) (stating court does not have jurisdiction over unserved party “unless it waived service or entered a general appearance”); see also Maiz v. Virani, 311 F.3d 334, 340 (5th Cir. 2002) (“A party makes a general appearance whenever it invokes the judgment of the court on any question other than jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, our court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (timely filing notice of appeal is jurisdictional requirement).
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.