United States v. Jackson
United States v. Jackson
Opinion
Case: 24-10531 Document: 71-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-10531 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ September 29, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Iyon Amere Jackson, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20-CR-88-2 ______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Iyon Amere Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jackson has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Jackson’s claim of _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-10531 Document: 71-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2025
No. 24-10531
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jackson’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.