United States v. Hahn
United States v. Hahn
Opinion
Case: 24-40437 Document: 81-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED October 10, 2025 No. 24-40437 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Derrick Hahn, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:23-CR-240-1 ______________________________ Before Smith, Dennis, and Richman, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * Derrick Hahn pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm.
See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, he asserts that (1) § 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment; (2) § 922(g)(1) as applied to him violates the Second Amendment; and (3) § 922(g)(1) as applied to him violates the Commerce Clause. Hahn concedes that all three challenges are foreclosed.
See United States v. Kimble, 142 F.4th 308, 310 n.2 (5th Cir. 2025) (holding _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-40437 Document: 81-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/10/2025
No. 24-40437
that United States v. Diaz, 116 F.4th 458 (5th Cir. 2024), forecloses facial challenges to § 922(g)(1) based on the Second Amendment); United States v. Alaniz, 146 F.4th 1240, 1241 (5th Cir. 2025) (rejecting a defendant’s as- applied challenge to § 922(g)(1) because that defendant, like Hahn, had a prior felony conviction for burglary); Kimble, 142 F.4th at 310 n.2 (holding that United States v. Jones, 88 F.4th 571, 573 (5th Cir. 2023), forecloses Commerce Clause challenges to § 922(g)(1)).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.