U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2025

United States v. Harrington

United States v. Harrington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 31, 2025
United States v. Harrington

Opinion

Case: 25-40122 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/31/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-40122 FILED December 31, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Tremuir Arnae Harrington, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:23-CR-90-1 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Engelhardt, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Tremuir Arnae Harrington has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harrington has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Harrington’s _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 25-40122 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/31/2025

No. 25-40122 claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Harrington’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.