United States v. Castillo-Gonzalez

Case: 25-50575 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

No. 25-50575

Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 11, 2026

Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee, versus

Dario Castillo-Gonzalez,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:24-CR-3366-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: *

Dario Castillo-Gonzalez appeals following his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(1), arguing that the statutory enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). The Government has filed a motion for summary Case: 25-50575 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2026

No. 25-50575 affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time in which to file a brief. Castillo-Gonzalez takes no position on the motion.

As Castillo-Gonzalez concedes, his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553–54 (5th Cir. 2019); see also Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821, 838 (2024) (explaining that Almendarez-Torres “persists as a narrow exception permitting judges to find only the fact of a prior conviction” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). Summary affirmance is thus appropriate. See Groendyke Transp. Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.