U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026

United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 12, 2026
United States v. Jackson

Opinion

Case: 24-50930 Document: 98-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50930 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 12, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Jermaine Jackson, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:24-CR-97-1 ______________________________ Before Smith, Higginson, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Jermaine Jackson pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a convicted felon and was sentenced to 84 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. On appeal, he contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment both on its face and as applied

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-50930 Document: 98-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2026

No. 24-50930 to him under New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), as well as the Commerce Clause.

Jackson concedes that his Second Amendment challenges are foreclosed. See United States v. Diaz, 116 F.4th 458, 471–72 (5th Cir. 2024), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2822 (2025); United States v. Giglio, 126 F.4th 1039, 1044–45 (5th Cir. 2025). He likewise concedes that his Commerce Clause challenge is foreclosed. See United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145–46 (5th Cir. 2013); see also United States v. Perryman, 965 F.3d 424, 426 (5th Cir. 2020).

Accordingly, the district court’s final judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.