U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026

United States v. Rubio-Castillo

United States v. Rubio-Castillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2026
United States v. Rubio-Castillo

Opinion

Case: 25-10935 Document: 46-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-10935 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 17, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Javier Rubio-Castillo, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:25-CR-37-1 ______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Javier Rubio-Castillo pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm by an alien having been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(B). The district court sentenced him to 63 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On appeal, he argues, for the first time, that his statute of conviction violates the Second _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 25-10935 Document: 46-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2026

No. 25-10935

Amendment on its face and as applied to him in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). He also argues that § 922(g), as presently interpreted, exceeds Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, or alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief.

The Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED as moot, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.