U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026

United States v. Ealey

United States v. Ealey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2026
United States v. Ealey

Opinion

Case: 25-10292 Document: 75-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/02/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-10292

FILED April 2, 2026 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee, versus

Lakee Donae Ealey,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-188-1 ______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: *

The attorney appointed to represent Lakee Donae Ealey has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ealey has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with Case: 25-10292 Document: 75-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/02/2026

No. 25-10292 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.