U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026

United States v. Tepaz-Perez

United States v. Tepaz-Perez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 22, 2026
United States v. Tepaz-Perez

Opinion

Case: 25-50927 Document: 53-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-50927 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ June 22, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Serbelio Tepaz-Perez, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:23-CR-2551-1 ______________________________ Before Richman, Southwick, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Serbelio Tepaz-Perez appeals the revocation of his term of supervised release. He argues that his 12-month revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court ordered it to run consecutively to the 21-month sentence imposed for a new illegal reentry offense. Tepaz-Perez fails to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that applies to his revocation _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 25-50927 Document: 53-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2026

No. 25-50927 sentence or show that the district court committed a clear or obvious error by imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 322, 326 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008); Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.