U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026

Bennett v. Siffin

Bennett v. Siffin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 29, 2026
Bennett v. Siffin

Opinion

Case: 25-50217 Document: 63-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/29/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-50217 FILED July 29, 2026 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Thomas B. Bennett, Trustee for the MTE Litigation Trust, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Mark Siffin, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:21-CV-214 ______________________________ Before King, Southwick, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Appellant Mark Siffin appeals the jury’s verdict finding him liable for fraud and awarding $40 million damages against him. Siffin, the CEO of various oil companies, was sued by the trustee of a litigation trust created under a bankruptcy plan for the benefit of the oil companies’ creditors, a group of lenders. The jury found that Siffin committed fraud by entering into an amendment to a loan agreement and authorizing loan draws on the Case: 25-50217 Document: 63-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/29/2026

No. 25-50217 companies’ behalf while knowing the companies were in default of the loan agreement.

Siffin raises multiple issues on appeal, contending that the district court erred in denying his motions for summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law, admitting certain evidence at trial, and denying his post- judgment renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for new trial. We conclude that the economic-loss rule does not prevent the claim here and the other arguments fail to reverse. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.