U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026

United States v. Sierra-Cruz

United States v. Sierra-Cruz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 5, 2026
United States v. Sierra-Cruz

Opinion

Case: 25-50669 Document: 59-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 5, 2026 No. 25-50669 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Johes David Sierra-Cruz, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:25-CR-34-1 ______________________________ Before Smith, Stewart, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* Johes Sierra-Cruz appeals his 42-month sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He maintains the above-guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Assuming, without deciding, that Sierra-Cruz preserved his challenge regarding substantive reasonableness, see United States v. Navarro-Jusino, 993 F.3d 360, 362 n.2 (5th Cir. 2021), the district court did not abuse its Case: 25-50669 Document: 59-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/05/2026

No. 25-50669 discretion by varying upward based on Sierra-Cruz’s criminal history and characteristics, the need to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, and the need to protect the public from future crimes by Sierra-Cruz, see United States v. Woods, 102 F.4th 760, 765–66 (5th Cir. 2024); 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The sentence is well below the statutory maximum, and we have upheld proportionally greater variances. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2); United States v. Key, 599 F.3d 469, 475–76 (5th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.