U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1904

Roberts v. Shelby Steel Tube Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1904

131 F. 729; 65 C.C.A. 589; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314

Counsel

Charles A. Thatcher, for plaintiff in error., Doyle & Lewis and J. W. Schaufelberger, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Levine v. Buick-Olds-Pontiac Sales Co. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded, with directions to remand to the state court. Petition charged concurring acts of negligence of master and servant, and was therefore not a removable case, as presenting a separable controversy between plaintiff and the corporation, and is therefore governed by Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Dixon, 179 U. S. 131, 21 Sup. Ct. 67, 45 L. Ed. 121, and Hunt v. American Bridge Co. (decided by this court at the May session) 130 Fed. 302.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.