U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1909

C. Crane & Co. v. Sesher

C. Crane & Co. v. Sesher
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1909 · Lürton, Severens, Warrington
172 F. 1022; 96 C.C.A. 665; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047

Counsel

W. H. Maekoy and Charles Stevens, for plaintiffs in error., S. C. Bailey and J. C. Wright, for defendant in error.

C. Crane & Co. v. Sesher

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Noble v. Crane & Co. (decided by this court at the June session) 1G9 Fed. 55, where we affirmed an instruction for the defendant company. It was error in the court below to deny the request by plaintiff in error for a similar instruction ; Noble and Sesher having been hurt by the fall of the same scaffold at the same time. Reversed, and remanded for new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.