Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit /

1914

107 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinions from 1914.

  • Courtney v. Fidelity Trust Co. 219 F. 57, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • In re Richards Bros. 234 F. 1023, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Woodward v. Thissell 218 F. 810, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Gotfredson v. German Commercial Accident Co. 218 F. 582, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Kentucky Coal Lands Co. v. Mineral Development Co. 219 F. 45, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Breakwater Co. v. Donovan 218 F. 340, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • La Belle Box Co. v. Stricklin 218 F. 529, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Stephens 218 F. 535, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Eaton v. Shiawassee County 218 F. 588, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Cobb v. Sertic 218 F. 320, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Lake Shore Electric Ry. Co. v. Kurtz 218 F. 165, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Standard Boiler & Plate Iron Co. v. McWeeny 218 F. 361, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Lively v. Picton 218 F. 401, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson 218 F. 559, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Elliotte 218 F. 567, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Stellwagen v. Clum 218 F. 730, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Hocking Valley R. v. New York Coal Co. 217 F. 727, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Wheeling & L. E. R. Co. v. Carpenter 218 F. 273, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Stearns Salt & Lumber Co. v. Hammond 217 F. 559, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • The Elenore 217 F. 753, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Turk v. Illinois Cent. R. 218 F. 315, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Lewis, Leonhardt & Co. v. Southern Ry. Co. 217 F. 321, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. Sterling Cork & Seal Co. 217 F. 381, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. Clark 217 F. 760, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Davis Sewing Mach. Co. v. New Departure Mfg. Co. 217 F. 775, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • In re General Equity Rule 75 222 F. 884, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Peters v. McLaren 218 F. 410, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • United States Trust Co. v. Gordon 216 F. 929, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Davis 215 F. 349, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Ohio Varnish Co. v. Glidden Varnish Co. 215 F. 902, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • City of Detroit v. Grummond 216 F. 273, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • National Tube Co. v. Mark 216 F. 507, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Forster v. Hill 215 F. 73, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Gibson v. Chesapeake & O. R.Y. Co. 215 F. 24, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Huggins 215 F. 37, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Canton-Hughes Pump Co. v. Llera 215 F. 79, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. RY. Co. v. McIntyre 215 F. 91, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Weeghman v. Killifer 215 F. 289, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • McCalman v. Illinois Cent. R. 215 F. 465, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Perry v. Weed Chain Tire Grip Co. 215 F. 921, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Grand Rapids Show Case Co. v. Baker 216 F. 341, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Deupree v. Watson 216 F. 483, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • J. D. Randall Co. v. Fogelsong Mach. Co. 216 F. 599, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • J. D. Randall Co. v. Fogelsong Mach. Co. 216 F. 601, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co. 216 F. 604, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • United States Frumentum Co. v. Lauhoff 216 F. 610, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Dibert v. Wernicke 214 F. 673, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Pennsylvania Co. v. Cole 214 F. 950, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Sona v. Aluminum Castings Co. 214 F. 938, (6th Cir. 1914)
  • Nashville Syrup Co. v. Coca Cola Co. 215 F. 527, (6th Cir. 1914)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑