U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1918

Woo Shing v. Fluckey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 12, 1918 · Denison, Hollister, Knappen

250 F. 598; 162 C.C.A. 614; 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935

Counsel

F. it. Marvin, of .Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant., E. S. Wertz, U. S. Atty., and Joseph C. Breitenstein, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Woo Shing v. United States (6th Cir. 1922)
United States v. Woo Jan (6th Cir. 1917)
Ex parte Woo Jan (District Court, E.D. Kentucky 1916)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The decision of this case having been continued until the Supreme Court should answer the questions certified to it by this court in the matter of United States v. Woo Jan (No. 3025) 250 Fed. 597, - C. C. A. —, and such questions having now been answered, as appears by the mandate of that court filed in this court in the matter of United States v. Woo Jan (No. 3025) 245 U. S. 552, 38 Sup. Ct. 207, 62 L. Ed. -, from which mandate *599it appears that the Department of Labor had no jurisdiction to issue the warrant under which Woo Shing was held:

Ordered, that the order of the District Court be reversed and vacated, and the cause be remanded, with instructions that Woo Shing be discharged from custody.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.