Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit /

1922

114 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • Glenberg v. United States 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 37, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Midland Linseed Products Co. v. Sargent Co. 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 100, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Ormsby v. Finney 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 132, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Hadfield-Penfield Steel Co. v. Eastern Production Co. 281 F. 382, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Aslaksen 281 F. 444, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Albert v. United States 281 F. 511, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Johnson v. United States 281 F. 536, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Midland Linseed Products Co. v. Charles R. Sargent Co. 281 F. 704, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Dayton Bronze Bearing Co. v. Gilligan 281 F. 709, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • O'Neal v. Stuart 281 F. 715, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • J. H. Day Co. v. Green 281 F. 719, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Lanz v. Pennsylvania R. 281 F. 796, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Glenberg v. United States 281 F. 816, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Katz v. United States 281 F. 129, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Biskind v. United States 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 132, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Biskind v. United States 281 F. 47, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Rembrandt v. United States 281 F. 122, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Hand & Johnson Tug Line v. Canada S. S. Lines, Ltd. 281 F. 779, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • McWhorter v. United States 281 F. 119, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Presont v. United States 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 37, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Presont v. United States 281 F. 131, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Ford v. United States 281 F. 298, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • City of Louisville v. Louisville Ry. Co. 281 F. 353, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Bloch v. Eastern Mach. Screw Co. 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 5, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co. v. D'Arcy Spring Co. 280 F. 945, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Rossman v. United States 280 F. 950, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Clark v. Wheatley 281 F. 55, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Gichanov v. United States 281 F. 125, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Memphis St. R. v. Townes 281 F. 127, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Bloch v. Eastern Mach. Screw Corp. 281 F. 777, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Ormsby v. Finney 281 F. 840, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • City of Louisville v. Louisville Home Telephone Co. 279 F. 949, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Yaffee v. United States 279 F. 746, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • O'Reilly v. City of Cambridge 279 F. 961, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Lewis v. United States 280 F. 5, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Greenbaum v. United States 280 F. 474, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • McCree v. Davis 280 F. 959, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Reynolds v. United States 280 F. 1, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Herbrand Co. v. Lackawanna Steel Co. 280 F. 11, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Mayes v. United States Trust Co. 280 F. 25, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Vanceburg & Stout'sS Lane Turnpike Road Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. 280 F. 482, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Bailey v. United States 278 F. 849, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Adkins 278 F. 854, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Louisville Soap Co. v. Taylor 279 F. 470, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Tutweiler v. Lowery 279 F. 479, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • H. W. Paine & Co. v. Manistee Tanning Co. 279 F. 340, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Norton Iron Works 279 F. 32, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • In re Franklin Tractor Co. 278 F. 732, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Thomas v. United States 278 F. 1022, (6th Cir. 1922)
  • Union Electric Welding Co. v. Curry 279 F. 465, (6th Cir. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑