Ross v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Ross v. United States, 23 F.2d 679 (6th Cir. 1928)
1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3238
Ross v. United States
Opinion of the Court
The conviction on the first count cannot be sustained. It sufficiently alleges carrying on the business of selling by one who was required to register and who had not; but the proof tended to show nothing except the purchase by respondent of narcotics in or from an unstamped
The second count is good. There was substantial evidence to go to the jury. The sentence did not exceed that imposable under the second count. It is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ROSS v. UNITED STATES
- Status
- Published