Ross v. United States
Ross v. United States
23 F.2d 679; 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3238
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Ross v. United States
Opinion of the Court
The conviction on the first count cannot be sustained. It sufficiently alleges carrying on the business of selling by one who was required to register and who had not; but the proof tended to show nothing except the purchase by respondent of narcotics in or from an unstamped
The second count is good. There was substantial evidence to go to the jury. The sentence did not exceed that imposable under the second count. It is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.