U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1928

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided November 15, 1928
30 F.2d 1007; 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2287 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Fraukel, Brunenkant & Frankel, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff in error., A. E. Bernsteen, IJ. S. Atty., and Irene Nungesser, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio, and F. F. Toomey, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of District Court affirmed, with costs, on authority of Law v. U. S., 266 U. S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401, Fleischmann Co. v. U. S., 270 U. S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624, Oyler v. Railway Co., 16 F.(2d) 455, and Frankie Bros. Co. v. Routzahn, 26 F.(2d) 1018.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.