Detroit Consolidated Theatres v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision. The 13 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Estate of Thomas v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1985)
- Duncan Industries, Inc., etc. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1979)
- Cagle v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1974)
- Lieber v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1993)
- Gaines v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1982)
- Planned Communities, Inc. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Malmstedt v. Commissioner (4th Cir. 1978)
- Parks v. United States (District Court, N.D. Texas 1977)
- Cagle v. Commissioner (5th Cir. 1976)
- Evans v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1974)
- Brothers v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1974)
- Riss & Co. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1964)
- Gilken Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Rev. (6th Cir. 1949)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel. And it appearing that the United States Board of Tax Appeals correctly decided that the Commissioner did not err in including in petitioner’s gross income for 1937 the sum of $3,358.27, representing an amount received by petitioner from a lessee as an advance rental deposit under the terms of a lease and received during the taxable year, for the reas'on that when received the petitioner’s right thereto was under no restriction as to its disposition, use or enjoyment, Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 201, 54 S.Ct. 356, 78 L.Ed. 725; North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U.S. 417, 424, 52 S.Ct. 613, 76 L.Ed. 1197. And it appearing that the Board of Tax Appeals correctly decided that commissions paid during the taxable year which represented the cost to petitioner of securing two long-term loans were not deductible in full for the year when paid but should be spread ratably over the period of the loans: It is ordered that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (now the Tax Court of the United States) be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.