U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1948

Siarto v. Commissioner

Siarto v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 8, 1948 · No. 10627 · Allen, Hicks, Martin
171 F.2d 293; 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 639; 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2942 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Edgar W. Pugh and George L. Cassidy, both of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner., Theron L. Caudle, Charles Oliphant, Sewall Key, Bernard D. Daniels, George A. Stinson, Ellis N. Slack, and Irving I. Acelral, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Siarto v. Commissioner

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

. This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel. And no reversible error appearing in the record: It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be, and it hereby is affirmed for the reasons given and the grounds stated in the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.