U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1951

Harry Gregory v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 17, 1951 · Allen, McALLISTER, Miller, Per Curiam

191 F.2d 856; 29 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2022 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

David C. Walls, Matthew O. Henchey, Louisville, Ky., Harry M. Leet, Washington, D. C., for appellants., ' G S. Landrum, Lexington, Ky., J. P. Hamilton, H. T. Lively, Robert E. Hogan, all of Louisville, Ky., Richard R. Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Co. (8th Cir. 1958)
Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad (8th Cir. 1958)
Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (5th Cir. 1957)
Bostian v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. (4th Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel;

And it appearing that the Findings of Fact by the District Judge are in accordance with the stipulation of the parties-herein, and that his -Conclusions of Law correctly apply the legal principles applicable thereto ;

It is ordered that, for the reasons given-by the District Judge in said Conclusions-of Law and upon the authority of Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell, 337 U.S. 521, 69 S.Ct. 1287, 93 L.Ed. 513, and Raulins v. Memphis Union Station Co., 6 Cir., 168 F.2d 466, the judgment of the District Court, herein appealed from, is affirmed 92 F.Supp. 770.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.