Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander, 194 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1952)
Allen, Hicks, Per Curiam, Simons

Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or m respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,

The judgment below is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Percy BADHAM, Appellant, v. Eugene ALEXANDER, Appellee
Status
Published